This course is part of the programme:
Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology graduate study programme (Third Level)
Objectives and competences
Skills in science communication, critical data analysis and reporting, together with dissemination abilities will be developed thanks to opportunities of scientific discussion and reporting.
Following competences are acquired during the course:
- Skills in science data reporting
- Skills in science communication
- Skills in science writing (The structure of a scientific paper; Navigating reference systems)
- Skills in science discussion
- Skills in reading and critical evaluation of the literature
- Active participation to scientific environment.
Content (Syllabus outline)
In the second year, research project progression should be presented, with evident substantial improvements in number of data, technical knowledge and innovation. Project report should critically identify solutions to overcome possible problems and provide future plans to fulfil initial aims.
Written report should contain also conference contributions, publications and dissemination material produced by the student during the academic year.
Report is signed by mentors and represents a document of research progression.
The course assessment consists of an annual Written project report signed by the mentor and an Oral project presentation performed in front of the members of a Program evaluation committee elected by the Scientific council and in the presence of student’s mentors. The learning outcome will be quantified in a 1:3 ratio. In particular as the following:
- Written project report (max 3 points in total) – quality of the report (quality, novelty and originality, max 1 point), impact of the project (for the society, for economy, max 1 point), student’s achievements (publications, conference abstracts, outreach activities, max 1 point).
- Oral project presentation (max 7 points in total) – quality of the oral project presentation (introduction, methodology, results, future plans; max 4 points), ability in scientific discussion (max 2 points), communication skills (max 1 point).
All students will receive a written evaluation Committee report. Students not fulfilling minimum requirements will be asked to have a second evaluation in a three months time.
A grade of 8/10 in Science Communication II exam represents a minimum requirement for the submission of the thesis.
Second year students must prepare also the PhD topic proposal. The document contains introduction of future PhD thesis, aims, methods, preliminary data and references. Document is signed by mentors and students and submitted to scientific council.
Intended learning outcomes
In the second year, students present their research project progression, including proposed solutions to overcome possible problems and provide future plans to fulfil initial aims. Additionally, a written report about the research progress and other research-related activities (paper publishing, conference presentation, dissemination activities,..) is a substantial part of the course, with the primary goal to assist student in the communication skills improvement.
Second year students prepare also the PhD topic proposal. The document is based on the critical evaluation of the relevant literature, but it also contains research aims, methods, preliminary data analysis and references.
- Relevant literature in the field
- Writing Academic English, Fourth Edition; The Longman Academic Writing Series, Level 4
- Writing Science: How to Write Papers That Get Cited and Proposals That Get Funded, Joshua Schimel, Oxford University Press, 2012
Oral presentation (70%) and Written report (30%).
Martina Bergant is Assistant professor at the University of Nova Gorica
1. Bergant M, Banks L. 2013 SNX17 facilitates infection with diverse papillomavirus types. J Virol. ;87(2):1270-3.
2. Pim D, Bergant M, Boon SS, Ganti K, Kranjec C, Massimi P, Subbaiah VK, Thomas M, Tomaić V, Banks L. Human papillomaviruses and the specificity of PDZ domain targeting. FEBS J. 2012 Oct;279(19):3530-7.
3. Bergant M, Ozbun MA, Campos SK, Myers MP, Banks L. 2012 Human papillomavirus L2 facilitates viral escape from late endosomes via sorting nexin 17. Traffic. Print ed., 2012, 13(3), 455-467.
4. Bergant M, Meden L, Repnik U, Sojar V, Stanisavljević D, Jeras M. 2006 Preparation of native and amplified tumour RNA for dendritic cell transfection and generation of in vitro anti-tumour CTL responses. Immunobiology. 211(3):179-89.
5. Jeras M, Bergant M, Repnik U. 2005 In vitro preparation and functional assessment of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells-potential antigen-specific modulators of in vivo immune responses. Transpl Immunol. 14(3-4):231-44.
University course code: 8MG016
Year of study: 2
- Exercises: 15 hours
- Individual work: 105 hours
Course type: compulsory
Learning and teaching methods:
• reading and critical assessment of the literature • research data analysis • oral scientific research presentation • written report of research progression • participation in academic and research activities • scientific achievements, conference contributions, publications • phd topic proposal preparation